iopfr.blogg.se

Unraid pro
Unraid pro








  1. #UNRAID PRO FOR FREE#
  2. #UNRAID PRO WINDOWS 10#
  3. #UNRAID PRO LICENSE#
  4. #UNRAID PRO PLUS#

#UNRAID PRO WINDOWS 10#

My technology Rig: The wizard: OS Windows 10 home edition / CPU Ryzen R7 1800x 3.95MHz / Corsair H110i / PSU Thermaltake Toughpower 750watt / ASUS CH 6 / Gskill Flare X 32GB DDR4 3200Mhz / HP 10GB Single Port Mellanox Connectx-2 PCI-E 10GBe NIC / 512GB 960 pro M.2 / ASUS GeForce GTX 1080 STRIX 8GB / Acer - H236HLbid 23.0" 1920x1080 60Hz Monitor HP Monitor But you've already bought gear so, onward.My daily driver: The Wrath of Red : OS Windows 10 home edition / CPU Ryzen TR4 1950x 3.85GHz / Cooler Master MasterAir MA621P Twin-Tower RGB CPU Air Cooler / PSU Thermaltake Toughpower 750watt / ASRock x399 Taichi / Gskill Flare X 32GB DDR4 3200Mhz / HP 10GB Single Port Mellanox Connectx-2 PCI-E 10GBe NIC / Samsung 512GB 970 pro M.2 / ASUS GeForce GTX 1080 STRIX 8GB / Acer - H236HLbid 23.0" 1920x1080 60Hz Monitor x3 I would have recommended staying with Synology as they are dead simple. I nodded my head through this entire post until I got to Hyper-V.Īs a media server, NextCloud would be great but if you're using it to backup VMs as well, I'd throw a Linux distro on there such as Ubuntu. I wouldn't have recommended Ubuntu five years ago over CentOS, but I look around and almost all my production Linux VM's are Ubuntu LTS now (on Hyper-V). If you want file server/file storage/Veeam repository, you're way better off with a standard Linux distro. If you want a media server, use NextCloud, it's really great. Having all the weird junk on it just complicates your life.

#UNRAID PRO PLUS#

Why not Ubuntu LTS? Makes a GREAT Veeam repository, and it doesn't have any of the weird UnRAID junk in it, and is Linux based instead of BSD (which I started with 30 plus years ago).

#UNRAID PRO LICENSE#

I love the spirit of the Berkeley license and was personally a beneficiary starting in 1989, but their violating GPL licensing as part of that project is just not cool. Plain FreeBSD as a fileserver is way better than FreeNAS and all the entangled proprietary crap those jokers push. Ubuntu is a great distro to host NextCloud on, as a VM. NextCloud as a VM on a hypervisor and as a backup target is a far superior media server to the weird ass FreeNAS file sharing and media hosting roles that can be installed. Were you concerned about running Ubuntu as a VM *on* Hyper-V? it's a slam dunk, works great. Having a backup target running Ubuntu isn't useful unless a backup can be taken in the first place

#UNRAID PRO FOR FREE#

I hope OP realizes there are no backup API's for free ESXi, he may in fact be forced on to Hyper-V unless he ponies up the $$ for VMWare Essentials. What does Hyper-V have to do with it? Veeam is the important part of the picture, for a repository Ubuntu works GREAT. Once I moved back to EXT4 on the same Raid-6, the CPU dropped from 80-100% down to 10-15%. It took me a bit to determine that is was file system related. OMG! Did that tank things on heavy writes (cameras) or heavy read (streaming media i.e. I had someone spin up a Synology unit for me, and they chose BTRFS for the file system. In addition to the RAID used, pay attention to the file system you use on top of things. When I moved away from Synology HR, to Raid-6 the Synology box was able to handle the throughput and that was with 12 spinning drives (like your WD-Red drives) When using for writing camera data, performance dropped. I have seen performance issues on these hybrid raid setups thta affect throughput.

unraid pro unraid pro

Not only does performance lack, it has to do "funny things" (highly technical term) to allow for the various drive sizes. Why not just use Linux in the fist place? So, FreeNAS and Unraid are essentially broken Operating systems that have been bastardized for a purpose.










Unraid pro